| Bringing back the forests through Assisted Natural Regeneration |
|
|
| Wednesday, 03 March 2010 | |||||
Pedro Walpole
Environmental rehabilitation, especially for degraded forest areas, is often viewed within a reforestation program where fast-growing species that thrive well in other countries are selected for planting. The Philippine experience of massive contract reforestation in the late ‘80s financed by the Asian Development Bank and other development agencies however generated limited impact. The experience generated however the profusion of exotic tree species such as Gmelina sp and Swietenia macrophylla which up till now are dominant species used for reforestation activities.
And somewhere along the way of contract reforestation, the social aspect was lost in translation as communities were engaged to plant with the expectations of future harvesting, only to be disappointed when they realized they were not allowed to cut upon maturity.
Likewise put aside is assisted natural regeneration or ANR that provides a more promising approach that is not expensive, promotes the propagation of local forest species that naturally thrive in the area, and works better with traditional systems of forest management in many upland communities, mangrove areas and swamps, and coastal areas with beach forests.
The critical role of communities in forest management, especially in the Asia-Pacific region where many communities live within forest areas, is generally accepted and acknowledged. Where governments have had limited State management and control over forest areas, there are now strategies and programs that recognize the viability of working with communities.
However, there is little emphasis placed on the significant potential of ANR that exemplifies the overall lack of attention given to this promising approach.
ANR has the potential to contribute significantly in addressing the region's forest rehabilitation challenges. Although there are still several needs and requirements to fulfill in order to ensure widespread successful application of ANR, these constraints can be overcome with increased awareness, commitment, research and training.
ESSC highlights 10 aspects of ANR that warrant increased attention, if ANR is to move forward successfully, developed and shared by Peter Walpole, SJ in a workshop "Advancing ANR in Asia and the Pacific" sponsored by the Food and Agricultural Organization-Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.
The 10 aspects of assisted natural regeneration 1. Environments of the region Whitmore (1990) describes 14 tropical forest formations in the Asia-Pacific region. These forest types and their characteristic ecologies require ongoing study for their regeneration to be understood, not to mention the diversity of responses and levels of technical and social consideration that are just as complex. Today, human activities are understood to affect nearly all environments and their distribution. All of the ecosystems we are now trying to rehabilitate in different areas, whether forest or not, were significantly altered by human activities. People tend to only consider forests in the uplands and, if they exist, in the lowlands. However, mossy forests, swamp forests and coastal mangroves, even though just as important, are often regarded as being marginal rather than critical. The biophysical factors of climate, soils, and others, influence natural regeneration through very different timeframes. Therefore, the effort of assistance requires the knowledge of how to align these factors for more rapid change while reducing the risk. 2. Different forms and understanding of ANR
There are numerous forms and understanding of what constitutes ANR in different places. These need further consideration and deliberation in order to reach common understanding. Among the relevant questions to be resolved are the following: "Natural" or "original" cover usually refers to the ecosystem (or at least the species composition) that occurs in undisturbed areas. Therefore, to assist - where the natural vegetation has largely been lost - is to do so with pioneer species, or those that would play that role in the path of succession. Can this be considered ANR, as long as the effort is focused on attaining the original species, albeit selected with a bias? When farmers develop whole new plant "cultures" of agroforestry species that mimic the structure or diversity of the original forest, but do not include the species of the original forest, should these areas be considered as ANR? 3. Traditional systems It is in traditional systems that people are most convinced of the efficiency of ANR. People are more easily convinced once seeing the how local people apply ANR. However, the challenge is for the "culture" of broader society to translate such integrity of local action into national strategies. The daily operations of a globalizing society must integrate such traditional knowledge in such a way that it becomes indispensable to the daily understanding of sustainability in our society. All countries have traditional systems of various forms. Government institutions, however, often fail to recognize the need to learn from such systems and to give them greater support. The historical labeling of traditional systems, such as "slash-and-burn," needs to be revised. It must also be recognized that the pressures are becoming increasingly too great for any single culture to maintain a sustainable forest regeneration system by traditional means alone. Culturally, traditional systems of ANR are usually managed in conjunction with a whole way of life and broader land use management approaches. What consideration is given to the total cultural picture and how much attention do we give to the part that is not focused on the "natural" but on the "cultural"? 4. Relation to local communities The greater recognition of traditional practices is undeniable, and much is being learned from studying and working with these systems. However, the extent of involvement on the ground has to be much broader and has to incorporate social units that are more extensive in area and more connected to the political economy. Communities are restricted in many ways by the limited legal agreements and by the limited and often contradictory support or incentives given. Area appropriateness and the extent of possible management need to be understood for the individual, village and broader social grouping. Costs in terms of time spent and lag times in returns from the new level of protection and limited extraction have to be creatively compensated, without creating dependencies. Benefit sharing and remuneration for maintaining areas in the long term are few, yet it is often not practical to leave these areas under government management. 5. Constraints and impediments There are widespread constraints and impediments that face most environmental recovery efforts in the rural environment. The following constraints need to be reviewed specifically with respect to ANR.
6. State of the art of ANR "State of the art" is one of the few phrases that incorporates the sense of modernity and culture, the technology, and the uniqueness of human creativity. The present state runs from the most basic to the most recent discoveries:
7. Patterns of regeneration Along with agricultural intensification, the global pattern of vegetation cover is expected to alter strategically, in terms of area and composition (Wood et al., 2000). The difficulty is to protect critical areas, especially in the uplands. In many countries of Asia, attempts to increase forest cover are largely unsuccessful. The pattern of regeneration in different areas is patchy and the density of regeneration is inadequate in many cases. There is, however, an increasing number of substantial reports indicating the success and extent of ANR, including the following:
8. Development mechanisms Translation of existing and emerging knowledge on ANR into effective support mechanisms for forest regeneration is an ongoing challenge. A serious shift in support mechanisms beyond studies and pilot activities needs to enter national and bilateral agendas. Maintaining forest must be seen as an active process, in the light of pressures and competition from other sectors. The approach requires careful identification of stakeholders and development of organizational relations, silviculture skills, sustainable extraction practices, and market linkages. The "quality of life" concept needs to be reintroduced into development paradigms to replace the present overly-politicized "terrorism and poverty alleviation" phraseology frenzy. 9. Research needs and topics There are both technical and social research considerations that need greater attention and effective development. Complementing studies are needed in the following areas:
10. Building strategies and agendas Challenges remain on all fronts while the importance and potential of ANR is known and internalized by only a few at present. Part of trying to make ANR an acceptable and obvious strategy is that it loses its specific and decisive focus and becomes part of a general plan (sometimes in relation to poverty alleviation etc.), in which it is the weaker component and loses out. There is a need for much greater discussion and publicizing of its potential for forest regeneration. A primary agenda has to be developed with local governments to define their role in environmental management and protection of ecological services, while simultaneously instilling a sense of local value. The nature of support needed to enhance ANR is not that of typical development loans; rather, such assistance could focus on changing the political attitude and policy environment. |
|||||
| Last Updated ( Tuesday, 20 December 2011 ) | |||||



