|
With the support of the
Ateneo School of Government (ASOG) , the Institute of Environmental
Science for Social Change (ESSC) put together institutional
documentation of previous mining dialogues and mine site visits that
ESSC facilitated with various stakeholders in mining.
Reports in PDF format:
Accompanying
these reports were ESSC’s overview and analysis in each of the
reports that focused on the mining-related conflicts and concerns
that indigenous and local communities, local governments and other
on-site mining stakeholders identified, the mechanisms for addressing
these conflicts and concerns, and the capacity and gaps of these
mechanisms.
Site Visit Dialogues:
Legacy Mine Visits:
Mining Related Maps:
- Atlas Mining Site, Toledo City, Cebu (A4 size, 165KB)
- Benguet B.L.I.S.T Land Use Map (A4 size, 276KB)
- Benguet Geological and Mineral Resources Distribution Map (A3 size, 565KB)
- Benguet Major Watershed Map (A4 size, 472KB)
- Itogon and the Baguio Mineral District, Benguet Province (A4 size, 92KB)
- Tenure and Resource Management in Lituban Watershed, Siocon, Zamboanga del Norte (A3 size, 1,276KB)
- Manila Mining Corporation Mine Site, Placer, Surigao del Norte (A4 size, 92KB)
- Surigao Mining District, Surigao del Norte, Caraga Region (A4 size, 156KB)
An essay on mining in the
Philippines was also developed that integrated ESSC’s various
inputs in other fora and discussions and puts forward an analysis
that intends to contribute critically in setting a new agenda in the
mining discussions.
Way forward
Three years into the
implementation of the National Minerals Policy, there is a need to
define an appropriate dialogue strategy in the coming years. And
this needs to take into account the complexity of mining-related
conflicts and recent events that reveal the weaknesses of relevant
policies, lapses and gaps in governance and the poor level of
accountability demonstrated by some mining companies in dealing with
environmental and social acceptability issues to mining projects.
At the national level, it
is presently difficult to initiate as the credibility and trust is
very low. National government line agencies such as the Department
of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and its Mines and
Geosciences Bureau (MGB) and the Environmental Management Bureau
(EMB) , with the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) are
hard put to respond to the various concerns emerging from specific
mining-related situations. Mining-related conflicts and associated
environmental and socio-cultural (especially, indigenous peoples)
issues, as well as of mining companies that are aggressively entering
areas, are sprouting in different parts of the country.
Concerned government
agencies and mining companies must prove that they are undertaking
concrete actions to meet tougher accountability standards to
establish the much needed trust.
The opportunity for
dialogue is more workable at the local or regional level discussions,
without completely discounting the opportunities for national (and
international) engagements. Conflicts are necessarily local,
affecting lives, livelihoods, relationships and cultures, communities
and the immediate environment. It is the in situ stakeholders –
indigenous and local communities, local governments units, local
groups and assisting non government organizations, church groups,
mining companies – who are feeling the impact most and whose
capacity in accessing and processing information and decision making
need to be strengthened.
|